As opposed to the first installment, which had a much more meandering pace, this one moves along quite nicely. The premise is well conceived and has a much better structure.
But with a more appealing narrative comes more distracting plot holes. Why would they ever take a bus to Halloweentown when they can just walk through a portal every time. Also, some problems could have obviously been solved earlier, but weren’t addressed in order to stretch the script to fill the runtime. For instance, if Gort had told them much earlier about his time portal it would have saved Luke and Marnie all that trouble trying to find a way to get back to the future. And then you introduce the time-travel element, which has no set of rules whatsoever, avoiding all explanation as to how the characters are defying the laws of physics. As a pedant for these kinds of details, I found myself getting a headache from a movie that is really easy to follow.
Of course we have to realize that it is a film targeted towards young adults. Although it’s not without a porous script, it’s more engaging than its predecessor and much funnier too. It’s a bigger and better movie, and closer to what the previous film should have been.
Twizard Rating: 82
It’s Halloween time, so I’ve decided to watch some Halloween films of the non-scary variety. Idle Hands may not be a terrible movie, but it’s also not all that memorable. There doesn’t seem like too much of a purpose to it all.
Reminiscent of the Evil Dead films, this film subtly sprinkles comedy over the horror, but still doesn’t invoke many laughs. But as nostalgia, we can look back and somewhat appreciate this film for what it is. It serves as a nice addition to the cult halloween movie genre.
It’s seldom laugh-out-loud, and it’s also not terribly quotable. However, the cast is fun to watch and it’s far from boring. Idle Hands is so goofy that it just works.
Twizard Rating: 74
The subject of race is often met with bias in one direction or the other. Not racism necessarily, but topics involving race and the tensions between races. Being from an area that is extremely diverse, I can’t relate to some of the examples displayed in this film. I grew up around people that don’t exclusively hang out with their own race, and where many were colorblind when it came to choosing their friends. My 2 best friends are Asian-American and black. My girlfriend is of Mexican heritage. I suppose that I was fortunate enough to be raised by parents who didn’t bring to my attention our differences, nor did they probably even think about it, but I know that the majority of the country isn’t this lucky. It’s just that some instances in this film come off as unrealistic to me. If all this stuff really does happen, then I can see how this movie would be effective.
This film involves the upper-middle class and how racial tensions affect them specifically. While the setting is highly essential for proving points, it’s also a hinderance. I should have brought a dictionary to the theater. The target audience for this movie may not understand a lot of the vocabulary. The verbiage is a quite highbrow and quick-delivered for the intents of the movie. That aside, the script is very self-aware and smart. It knows what its doing and saying at all times. And when it tries to be funny it succeeds.
This film does well what so many other teen and college movies don’t–it doesn’t overindulge in self-importance of the kids’ lives. For one, it’s because there is an importance of the topic being discussed. But it also doesn’t portray the students as having all the answers and doing it all on their own. Each character makes mistakes and each character says things that make a lot of sense. It’s a really honest film.
Dear White People handles a heavy topic surprisingly well and does a good job of remaining unbiased and not telling you what to think. Even though you want it to sometimes, you realize that no one has a definitive answer, and the only solution is to look at the world with colorblind eyes.
Twizard Rating: 83
The 1990s. Back when children’s television was at an all-time high, child actors weren’t hired for their looks, and Disney Channel Original Movies didn’t talk down to kids. In 1997, Disney rebranded their TV movies under the Disney Channel Original Movie marquee and their style of films also changed. They started featuring younger kids as main characters and had them dealing with their own issues. In 1998, Disney released their 5th DCOM, Halloweentown. Sure, it wasn’t perfect, but as a kid it invoked our imagination. The script is full of wit, and the talent here is really impressive too–especially the lead actress, Kimberly J. Brown, who went on to also star in another DCOM, Quints. Debbie Reynolds is also fantastic here as the adventurous and crazy grandmother that every kid wants.
Being a really fun live-action film for kids, Halloweentown doesn’t come without its faults. The dialogue can be a bit cheesy on occasion, and the little brother’s cynicism and the mom’s stubbornness get tiresome after awhile. Also, as great of a movie this was as a child, as an adult I realize that the concept is underutilized. There’s this magical place that we still dream about as grownups, however we’re left wanting to see more of this world. Much like Back to the Future Part II when we get enveloped by futuristic Hill Valley to the point where we can fill in the gaps in our minds. With Halloweentown there are too many gaps to fill in that we don’t really feel like we’ve experienced this universe enough. Don’t get me wrong, I still can appreciate this film as an adult. The sets, the costumes, the few buildings that we do see are great. But it would be ten times more entertaining if we got a little more. In theory, Halloweentown is amazing, but we leave feeling cheated. I guess that’s why they made 3 more movies.
It’s easy to just say that the plot was stretched too thin here, but that’s saved for movies that have concepts that can’t be expanded upon. With Halloweentown it’s more of a case that the plot simply wasn’t as thick as it should have been. Because it should be able to get stretched for days and days and never even show signs of thinning. Let’s just hope that they fix this in the sequels.
Basically, as a kid, this film is exactly what you want. Watching as an adult I just yearn for it to reach its potential.
Twizard Rating: 76
The biggest complaint that I heard with this film is that it’s full of cliches. I have to disagree somewhat. Yeah, sure, I know that it’s the typical father-son drama where the dad never had time for his son and all that cat’s in the cradle stuff. But when it comes down to it, this film goes far beyond the typical courtroom drama. It’s full of surprises and twists that are slowly and carefully exposed along the course of the narrative. The first act takes its time, but never drags. It doesn’t rush to reveal the plot all at once, saving things for later and not spoiling us with all the details right away. But then it gets really interesting when you don’t see it coming.
While I’m praising it, the acting and writing were phenomenal. Robert Downey Jr. commands your attention with his presence on screen, and his troubles with his father and his family are believable. It’s also really funny at the right times without ever becoming irreverent to the point at hand.
It’s well-paced and deceivingly flawless. You’re never able to predict the outcome. It remains mysterious enough to not make it predictable. Is it wrong that this movie gives us what we want? What we need? It makes points but never hands us our opinions on the characters. And it never tells us whose side to pick. Sure, it may be cliched at parts, but it’s thoroughly enjoyable and leaves us feeling something a lot rarer than what we’ve been getting at the movies lately–which means, by definition, that it is in fact the opposite of cliche.
Twizard Rating: 96
At first they were displeased with him and thought he would bring them down, but at a moment these 4 guys realize that Norman makes them better. Meanwhile, Norman learns a lot about himself and what he’s willing to do. And then it all comes full circle in the end with a moment of compassion show by a German soldier.
It’s always best to judge a film off of how well it serves its own purpose. Fury gets its point across well. It wants to show the rawest and most realistic form of war. It also wants to peak through the curtain to the other side. It was brilliantly executed here.
I also love the camerawork and direction that this movie has. It doesn’t waste too much time with shaky-cam in order to make it seem like more is happening, and you’re always sure of what’s going on. Every time a shot is fired, you know who is shooting it. There is a very human aspect to all of the combat.
There’s no bit of this film that I don’t like and enjoy. With great action sequences and memorable scenes, Fury serves its purpose of showing us the positive and negative impact that war had on the individuals immersed into it.
Twizard Rating: 100
Visually, this The BoxTrolls is next-to-perfect aesthetically. As far as the content of this film is concerned, it’s entertaining and intriguing. However, it’s not always laugh-out-loud funny. Charming would be a good word to describe it. It makes you smile a ton and has its fill of memorable characters, but there just aren’t a whole lot of memorable scenes. You also can’t help feeling like the plot is being stretched too thin, as there isn’t a whole lot that happens in this movie, and the runtime is still pretty short. Sure, much of it is used to establish setting, but it could have definitely ended sooner. The final “battle” scene dragged on for too long.
The visuals create a perfect world for itself and I commend it for its beauty, I just wish it was a little more memorable. However, it is rewatchable, which counts for a lot and will, in turn, etch it into my head easier.
Twizard Rating: 88
Steve Carell is always likable and where Jennifer Garner is meant to be funny, she is really funny. And while this film isn’t amazing, it’s also fairly entertaining. If you can get past the slow set up, the slapstick is pretty fun. However, there are a few screaming plot holes, and some of the minor characters who are contributing to this bad day can get annoying with their unrealistic behaviors. But the main cast was all really impressive, and a few bits had me laughing out loud.
The premise isn’t stale by any means, but nothing crazy enough happens in this movie that will get talked about after the day is over. But it’s a really good kids movie if nothing else.
Twizard Rating: 78
The thing about spoof movies of this sort is that it might make you laugh, but they are hard to warm up to. They sacrifice depth for humor. And in this movie’s case, there isn’t even a whole lot of genuine laughs. There aren’t even a whole lot of one-liners. Although some of the subtle details are clever and it does have its moments. A lot of scenes will even make you smile at the good points that they make, but unless you are watching this with a group of friends, it’s not really going to satisfy.
The worst part is that the cast is actually all really good. The talent here is better than even the above-average spoof movie.
It’s not terrible, but it’s not urgently rewatchable either. However, some of the subtle details are pretty clever and it actually does have its moments.
The cameos are great and it gets a lot of things off of its chest, but Not Another Teen Movie still won’t make you realize anything new about the films that it’s spoofing. I mean, in hindsight this is one of the better spoof movies that we’ve ever gotten, but there aren’t a whole lot of good ones to choose from. It’s definitely no Airplane.
Twizard Rating: 59
Taking pages out of John Hughes’ playbook, 10 Things I Hate About You falls just short of cliche as we forget that much of what made Hughes’ work so clever was that it invented its own cliches–as this film does. While it does subject to the usual idiot adults and predictable plot, there is a lot more depth here than the average teen comedy.
Although the chemistry between the leads and their respective partners is impressive, I did ask a little bit more from director Gil Junger. While I know he is more familiar with the world of television, I still expected him to pay a little bit more attention to minute details–which resulted in a bit of sloppiness from time to time.
The script has its ups and downs comedically, but as a whole this is a fun and enjoyable movie. It doesn’t rely on one-liners to carry the weight of its humor and it doesn’t waste time with subplots.
But although the laughs slow down at times, there aren’t really any eye-rolling jokes. And wisely, there are hints of self-satire carefully scattered throughout.
With a killer soundtrack and clever bits, you tend to forget that the premise isn’t groundbreaking. You have to judge a movie based off of its rewatchability, and this one is definitely one that I would watch again.
Twizard Rating: 86