scream movie poster

There’s no doubt why Scream was a game changer in the 1990s. It was slick, well-orchestrated, and turned the horror genre from cliche to cool by emphasizing those cliches and giving them the perfect amount of satire.

Other than its nostalgia-inducing ’90s soundtrack, Scream doesn’t get stuck in the era–unlike the films it’s inspired since then. Without targeting a narrow audience, it keeps in mind all demographics. Director Wes Craven has a different motive than most directors making movies about teenagers in the ’90s in that he doesn’t worry about making his movie cool for them. He just makes the film he wants, allowing it to become cool inadvertently. Though ironically every movie to come afterwards, trying to be Scream, changes this subtle detail. They try TOO hard to appear cool. Almost like they don’t get what the appeal is in the first place.

The film begins with an iconic opening scene with Drew Barrymore that just has to be experienced rather than described. In true Hitchcock fashion, our de facto protagonist gets killed off within 15 minutes, and we get a new one, Sidney, played by Neve Campbell. Now, we’re unsure whether or not she’s going to meet the same fate as Barrymore, but we have to wait and see.

The killer who got Drew is still out there. And we see him immediately. He’s dressed in the now-famous Ghostface costume. And while he isn’t terrifying at first glance, the suspense leading up to each of his appearances is so well-crafted that we grow to fear him. When he appears we gets some pretty amazing chase scenes.

For the duration of the film, the big mystery is trying to figure out who’s underneath the Ghostface mask. You think it’s obvious, but then you keep doubting yourself. But what really happens you never see coming. The red herrings along the way aren’t over-abundant, so we can pretty much rule out certain suspects. But then again, nearly everyone is a suspect at first.

The oft-below-par acting tends to magnify the humor in the script–perhaps inadvertently at first. But Craven also has the sense to keep the tone a little lighter so the experience can be more fun for the viewer. We don’t leave the film with dark images playing in our heads. We leave wanting more. And I can honestly say that this is the most fun I’ve ever had watching a horror film.

Twizard Rating: 97

5 responses to “Quick Movie Review: Scream (1996)”

  1. […] 3 is more over-the-top than Scream 1 and 2. Yet at the same time, it’s not. While watching this movie, I’m tempted to think […]

  2. […] there’s a certain magic present when creating something great in the moment. 1996’s Scream was an instant classic, breathing life into a dying genre. Horror films suddenly became viable […]

  3. […] fare that Kevin Williamson helped perpetuate in the late ’90s. First as the screenwriter on Scream, then later with Dawson’s Creek, and eventually landing his first and only directorial […]

  4. […] 1995, the slasher was all but dead. It’s the reason why, just one year later, Scream revitalized the genre with its self-referential parody and human-focused premise. ‘80s slashers […]

  5. […] tone that’s more satirical than anything else, we need someone like her to ground the insanity of Wes Craven’s 1996 classic. Similar to how The House on Sorority Row never massages its way into the macabre, Katey’s […]

Leave a comment

Trending